See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Pfennig - Rudolf von Hohenegg or later Friesach

Issuer Archbishopric of Salzburg (Austrian States)
Year 1286-1320
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Silver
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Central field depicts a stylized archiepiscopal figure rendered in the flat, schematic manner characteristic of late 13th-century Austrian bracteate-influenced pfennig coinage. The design features a frontal bust or enthroned figure with arms extended, holding what appears to be a crozier to the left and a cross or book to the right, set within a beaded inner circle. The composition is bold and deeply struck, with geometric, almost abstract rendering of drapery folds. The flan is irregular and slightly cracked at the lower edge, typical of hammered silver issues of this period. No legible legend is present on this side.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Friesach pfennigs were among the most commercially dominant coins in the medieval Adriatic and Balkan trade networks from the late twelfth century onward, copied by regional lords across Styria, Carinthia, and the Croatian littoral precisely because merchants demanded them. By Rudolf von Hohenegg's tenure the type had been in continuous production for over a century, and distinguishing archiepiscopal strikes from imitations — even contemporaneous ones — remains a persistent attribution problem. CNA Ca69a sits in that contested zone.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE