Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Obol - Nambed No king reverse

Uitgever Kingdom of Persis
Jaar 60-85
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Chian-Rhodian drachm
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Aramaic
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Central fire altar depicted in schematic form within a dotted border, flanked by attendant figures or stylized subsidiary elements. The field surrounding the altar contains Aramaic inscription fragments, though on this 'no king' type the royal name is absent. The design is characteristic of the Persis dynastic coinage tradition, rendered in a compact and somewhat schematic style typical of the obol denomination.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Persis, the region centered on modern Fars province in Iran, maintained a line of local dynasts who continued striking coins in an archaic Iranian style long after the Achaemenid collapse — a deliberate act of cultural continuity under both Seleucid and Parthian overlordship. The "no king reverse" types represent a particularly enigmatic subset of Persid coinage: the omission of the royal figure on the reverse remains unexplained by scholarship, with no consensus on whether it signals a transitional authority, an interregnum, or simply a regional die-cutting economy. Alram's numbering places this piece firmly in the late dynastic sequence, a period when Parthian pressure on Persis was intensifying before the region's eventual absorption.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT