Katalog
| Emittent | Heraia |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 420 BC - 375 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nennwert | Obol (⅙) |
| Währung | Drachm |
| Material | Silver |
| Gewicht | 0.75 g |
| Durchmesser | 11 mm |
| Dicke | |
| Form | Round (irregular) |
| Prägetechnik | Hammered |
| Ausrichtung | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Stempelschneider | |
| Im Umlauf bis | |
| Referenz(en) | Peloponnesos#1356 , BMC Greek#13 , HGC 5#828 |
| Aversbeschreibung | Head of Artemis left; bow before. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | |
| Averslegende | |
| Reversbeschreibung | Large E; E P A upward to left. |
| Reversschrift | Greek |
| Reverslegende | ΕΡΑ |
| Rand | |
| Prägestätte | |
| Auflage |
ND (420 BC - 375 BC) - - |
| Numisquare-ID | 9792250120 |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Historical Context: This silver obol was issued by Heraia, an Arcadian city in the Peloponnese, between 420 BC and 375 BC. This tumultuous period encompassed the final decades of the Peloponnesian War and the subsequent struggles for regional hegemony, particularly between Sparta and Thebes. Heraia, while not a major power, maintained its autonomy and economic activity, necessitating the issuance of fractional coinage like this obol for local commerce. Its production reflects the city's participation in the broader Hellenic monetary system amidst shifting political landscapes.
Artistry: While the engraver remains anonymous, this obol exemplifies the Late Classical stylistic trends prevalent in Arcadian numismatics. The small 11mm flan typically features a distinct obverse design, often a deity such as Hera, after whom the city was named, or Zeus. The reverse usually displays a civic emblem or monogram. Despite its diminutive size, the design aimed for clear recognition and conveyed Heraia's cultural identity through established iconographic traditions of the region.
Technical/Grading: Struck from a compact 0.75 gram silver flan, the technical execution of this obol often presents characteristic features of fractional coinage. High-points, such as the hair or facial features on the obverse, or raised elements of a reverse device, are frequently susceptible to wear. Due to the small flan size, minor off-centering or incomplete strikes on the periphery are common, though a well-centered example with full impression of the primary devices is highly desirable. Die wear can also impact the sharpness of finer details.