Katalog
| Emitent | Argos (Argolis) |
|---|---|
| Rok | 270 BC - 250 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nominał | Obol (⅙) |
| Waluta | Aeginetic drachm |
| Skład | Silver |
| Waga | 0.79 g |
| Średnica | 10 mm |
| Grubość | |
| Kształt | Round (irregular) |
| Technika | Hammered, Incuse |
| Orientacja | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Rytownik(zy) | |
| W obiegu do | |
| Źródło(a) | Peloponnesos#1116 Greek#95 III#647 5#681 |
| Opis awersu | Head of wolf left; Θ above. |
|---|---|
| Pismo awersu | Greek |
| Legenda awersu | Θ |
| Opis rewersu | Large A; Π-Υ across upper field, thunderbolt below; all within incuse square. |
| Pismo rewersu | Greek |
| Legenda rewersu | A Π Υ |
| Krawędź | |
| Mennica | |
| Nakład |
ND (270 BC - 250 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 4105185700 |
| Dodatkowe informacje |
Historical Context: Struck by the city-state of Argos in Argolis between 270 BC and 250 BC, this silver Obol belongs to the Late Hellenistic period. During this era, Argos, a key Peloponnesian power, navigated complex political currents, often contending with Macedonian influence and the Aetolian and Achaean Leagues. Reflecting its civic autonomy, Argos issued its own currency. This small denomination was vital for daily commerce and minor transactions, underscoring the city's economic activity and self-governance.
Artistry: The engraver remains anonymous, typical for civic issues prioritizing workshop output. Stylistically, this Obol adheres to Hellenistic naturalism, simplified by the diminutive 10mm flan. Argive obols of this period commonly feature a prominent head on the obverse, likely representing the city’s patron goddess Hera or a local hero. The reverse typically displays a concise civic emblem, such as a wolf's forepart, a club, or a monogram, embodying Argos’s identity and heritage.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 0.79 grams of silver, this Obol is a fractional currency. Key high-points for assessing strike quality and wear include the highest relief elements of the obverse portraiture, like hair or diadem, and the most raised aspects of the reverse emblem. Due to the small flan and rapid production, examples often show varying degrees of off-centering, incomplete strikes, or minor planchet irregularities, all crucial considerations for numismatic grading.