Obol

Emitent Argos (Argolis)
Rok 270 BC - 250 BC
Typ Standard circulation coin
Hodnota Obol (⅙)
Měna Aeginetic drachm
Složení Silver
Hmotnost 0.79 g
Průměr 10 mm
Tloušťka
Tvar Round (irregular)
Technika Hammered, Incuse
Orientace Variable alignment ↺
Rytci
V oběhu do
Reference Peloponnesos#1116 Greek#95 III#647 5#681
Popis líce Head of wolf left; Θ above.
Písmo líce Greek
Opis líce Θ
Popis rubu Large A; Π-Υ across upper field, thunderbolt below; all within incuse square.
Písmo rubu Greek
Opis rubu A Π Υ
Hrana
Mincovna
Náklad ND (270 BC - 250 BC) - -
ID Numisquare 4105185700
Další informace

Historical Context: Struck by the city-state of Argos in Argolis between 270 BC and 250 BC, this silver Obol belongs to the Late Hellenistic period. During this era, Argos, a key Peloponnesian power, navigated complex political currents, often contending with Macedonian influence and the Aetolian and Achaean Leagues. Reflecting its civic autonomy, Argos issued its own currency. This small denomination was vital for daily commerce and minor transactions, underscoring the city's economic activity and self-governance.

Artistry: The engraver remains anonymous, typical for civic issues prioritizing workshop output. Stylistically, this Obol adheres to Hellenistic naturalism, simplified by the diminutive 10mm flan. Argive obols of this period commonly feature a prominent head on the obverse, likely representing the city’s patron goddess Hera or a local hero. The reverse typically displays a concise civic emblem, such as a wolf's forepart, a club, or a monogram, embodying Argos’s identity and heritage.

Technical/Grading: Weighing 0.79 grams of silver, this Obol is a fractional currency. Key high-points for assessing strike quality and wear include the highest relief elements of the obverse portraiture, like hair or diadem, and the most raised aspects of the reverse emblem. Due to the small flan and rapid production, examples often show varying degrees of off-centering, incomplete strikes, or minor planchet irregularities, all crucial considerations for numismatic grading.

×