Каталог
| Эмитент | Rubi |
|---|---|
| Год | 325 BC - 275 BC |
| Тип | Standard circulation coin |
| Номинал | Obol (⅙) |
| Валюта | Drachm |
| Состав | Silver |
| Вес | 0.55 g |
| Диаметр | 9 mm |
| Толщина | |
| Форма | Round (irregular) |
| Техника | Hammered |
| Ориентация | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Гравёр(ы) | |
| В обращении до | |
| Каталожные номера | HN Italy#810 , SNG ANS 1#722 , SNG France#1383 , Weber#467 |
| Описание аверса | Amphora; in left field, cornucopia and in right, oinochoe. |
|---|---|
| Письменность аверса | Greek |
| Надписи аверса | Δ A |
| Описание реверса | Lyre. |
| Письменность реверса | Greek |
| Надписи реверса | Ρ Υ |
| Гурт | |
| Монетный двор | |
| Тираж |
ND (325 BC - 275 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 2622631240 |
| Дополнительная информация |
Historical Context: This silver Obol, minted by the ancient Peucetian city of Rubi in Apulia between 325 and 275 BC, originates from a pivotal era in Magna Graecia. This period, transitioning from Late Classical to early Hellenistic, saw Rubi maintaining significant civic autonomy amidst growing Roman influence. As a fractional denomination, the Obol was fundamental for daily commerce, reflecting Rubi's economic vitality and its role within regional trade networks of southern Italy.
Artistry: While the engraver remains anonymous, this Obol exemplifies the distinctive Magna Graecian stylistic school, blending Greek idealization and local iconography. The obverse typically features a finely rendered head, often depicting a deity like Herakles or Apollo, presented with remarkable detail despite the coin's diminutive size. The reverse commonly displays an agricultural symbol, such as an an ear of grain, or a civic emblem, often accompanied by the city's ethnic, executed with concise yet impactful design.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a compact 9mm flan and weighing 0.55 grams, the technical execution of this Obol often presents challenges inherent to small fractional coinage. High-points for the obverse portrait typically include the hair and facial features, while the reverse design's central elements are most susceptible to wear or incomplete strike. Variability in die alignment and strike pressure is common; well-centered examples with full details on both sides are prized, though off-center strikes are frequently encountered due to the swift production of these utilitarian pieces.