Katalog
| Emitent | Venusia |
|---|---|
| Rok | 210 BC - 200 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nominał | Nummus (1) |
| Waluta | Nummus (circa 218-201 BC) |
| Skład | Bronze |
| Waga | 31.05 g |
| Średnica | 34 mm |
| Grubość | |
| Kształt | Round (irregular) |
| Technika | Hammered |
| Orientacja | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Rytownik(zy) | |
| W obiegu do | |
| Źródło(a) | HN Italy#719 1#758 Morcom#237 Basel#65 Gr/It#19 Copenhagen#706 , Weber#484 |
| Opis awersu | Head of Dionysos right, wearing ivy wreath and earring; ligate VE to left. |
|---|---|
| Pismo awersu | |
| Legenda awersu | |
| Opis rewersu | Dionysos seated left, holding grape bunch in right hand and filleted thyrsos in left; NI to right. |
| Pismo rewersu | |
| Legenda rewersu | |
| Krawędź | |
| Mennica | |
| Nakład |
ND (210 BC - 200 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 9492112200 |
| Dodatkowe informacje |
Historical Context: This substantial Æ Nummus from Venusia, struck 210-200 BC, is a tangible relic of the tumultuous Second Punic War. As a pivotal Roman colony in Apulia, Venusia remained steadfastly loyal, even after Cannae. The issuance of this heavy bronze denomination (31.05g, 34mm) by a local authority underscores the period's economic pressures and decentralized financial needs. This coinage facilitated local commerce and military efforts against Hannibal, highlighting Venusia's resilience and strategic importance.
Artistry: While specific engravers are anonymous, the artistry of this Nummus reflects prevailing Hellenistic stylistic traditions adapted by local Apulian workshops. The design, typical for large bronze issues, would feature a prominent deity or allegorical representation on the obverse, rendered with robust, if sometimes provincial, detail. The reverse typically presented a complementary motif, often symbolic of the city's identity or Roman allegiance. The aesthetic aimed for clarity and gravitas, conveying its message within the local economic context.
Technical/Grading: The large flan (34mm) and considerable weight (31.05g) of this Æ Nummus presented characteristic technical challenges during striking. Consequently, examples often exhibit irregular flan shapes, off-center strikes, and variable strike pressure, leading to weaker impressions on high points like a deity's hair or nose, or reverse device edges. Die wear is also common. A well-struck specimen displays a relatively centered design with strong definition on primary iconographic elements, free from significant flan defects.