کاتالوگ
| صادرکننده | Venusia |
|---|---|
| سال | 210 BC - 200 BC |
| نوع | Standard circulation coin |
| ارزش | Nummus (1) |
| واحد پول | Nummus (circa 218-201 BC) |
| ترکیب | Bronze |
| وزن | 31.05 g |
| قطر | 34 mm |
| ضخامت | |
| شکل | Round (irregular) |
| تکنیک | Hammered |
| جهت | Variable alignment ↺ |
| حکاک(ها) | |
| در گردش تا | |
| مرجع(ها) | HN Italy#719 1#758 Morcom#237 Basel#65 Gr/It#19 Copenhagen#706 , Weber#484 |
| توضیحات روی سکه | Head of Dionysos right, wearing ivy wreath and earring; ligate VE to left. |
|---|---|
| خط روی سکه | |
| نوشتههای روی سکه | |
| توضیحات پشت سکه | Dionysos seated left, holding grape bunch in right hand and filleted thyrsos in left; NI to right. |
| خط پشت سکه | |
| نوشتههای پشت سکه | |
| لبه | |
| ضرابخانه | |
| تیراژ ضرب |
ND (210 BC - 200 BC) - - |
| شناسه Numisquare | 9492112200 |
| اطلاعات تکمیلی |
Historical Context: This substantial Æ Nummus from Venusia, struck 210-200 BC, is a tangible relic of the tumultuous Second Punic War. As a pivotal Roman colony in Apulia, Venusia remained steadfastly loyal, even after Cannae. The issuance of this heavy bronze denomination (31.05g, 34mm) by a local authority underscores the period's economic pressures and decentralized financial needs. This coinage facilitated local commerce and military efforts against Hannibal, highlighting Venusia's resilience and strategic importance.
Artistry: While specific engravers are anonymous, the artistry of this Nummus reflects prevailing Hellenistic stylistic traditions adapted by local Apulian workshops. The design, typical for large bronze issues, would feature a prominent deity or allegorical representation on the obverse, rendered with robust, if sometimes provincial, detail. The reverse typically presented a complementary motif, often symbolic of the city's identity or Roman allegiance. The aesthetic aimed for clarity and gravitas, conveying its message within the local economic context.
Technical/Grading: The large flan (34mm) and considerable weight (31.05g) of this Æ Nummus presented characteristic technical challenges during striking. Consequently, examples often exhibit irregular flan shapes, off-center strikes, and variable strike pressure, leading to weaker impressions on high points like a deity's hair or nose, or reverse device edges. Die wear is also common. A well-struck specimen displays a relatively centered design with strong definition on primary iconographic elements, free from significant flan defects.