Katalog
| Emitent | Kings of Pontos |
|---|---|
| Rok | 111 BC - 90 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Hodnota | |
| Měna | Drachm |
| Složení | Bronze |
| Hmotnost | 19.33 g |
| Průměr | 27 mm |
| Tloušťka | |
| Tvar | Round (irregular) |
| Technika | Hammered |
| Orientace | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Rytci | |
| V oběhu do | |
| Reference | HGC 7#222 , SNG von Aulock#6694 Sea#1048-1050 |
| Popis líce | Head of Zeus right. |
|---|---|
| Písmo líce | |
| Opis líce | |
| Popis rubu | Eagle standing left on thunderbolt, head right, wings spread. |
| Písmo rubu | Greek |
| Opis rubu |
ΑΜAΣΣEIAΣ (Translation: Amaseia) |
| Hrana | |
| Mincovna | |
| Náklad |
ND (111 BC - 90 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 4858646210 |
| Další informace |
Historical Context: This substantial Æ issue from Amaseia, dated 111-90 BC, falls within the formative period of Mithridates VI Eupator's reign as King of Pontos. During this era, Mithridates consolidated his vast Black Sea empire, establishing authority and preparing for confrontations with Rome. Amaseia, his ancestral capital, served as a vital economic hub. Such large bronze coinage underscores the kingdom's robust infrastructure and the king's assertion of sovereignty prior to the major Mithridatic Wars.
Artistry: The artistic execution of this bronze coin exemplifies the Hellenistic stylistic school prevalent in the Pontic kingdom. While engravers remain anonymous, designs typically feature a powerful portrayal of the king or a deity associated with his lineage, such as Dionysus or Perseus, on the obverse. The reverse often depicted symbols significant to Pontos or Amaseia, like a stag or a star and crescent motif, rendered with classical Greek naturalism and regional character. The large flan allowed for intricate detail, reflecting Pontic minting sophistication.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 19.33 grams and measuring 27 millimeters, this Æ coin represents a significant denomination. For optimal grading, collectors seek a strong, centered strike that fully brings up the high points of the design, particularly facial features or divine attributes on the obverse and intricate reverse emblem details. Common technical considerations include potential for minor flan irregularities, porosity inherent to ancient bronze coinage, and varying die wear. A well-preserved example exhibits clear legends and a robust overall impression.