Catalog
| Issuer | Judea |
|---|---|
| Year | 132-133 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | |
| Currency | Bar Kokhba Revolt ‒ Shekel (132-135) |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Weight | 34.6 g |
| Diameter | 32 mm |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | 3 August 0135 |
| Reference(s) | Hendin 5ᵗʰ#1375 |
| Obverse description | Inscription within a wreath |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Hebrew |
| Obverse lettering |
ירו שלם (Translation: Jerusalem) |
| Reverse description | Amphora with two handles |
| Reverse script | Hebrew |
| Reverse lettering |
שנת אחת לגאלת ישראל (Translation: Year one of the redemption of Israel) |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (132-133) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 5383315070 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: This large bronze coin, Hendin 5th#1375, dates to 132-133 CE, marking Year One of the Bar Kokhba Revolt. Issued by Simeon bar Kosevah, or Bar Kokhba, it signifies the initial, fervent assertion of Jewish independence against Roman rule. These coins served as powerful propaganda, proclaiming a provisional Jewish state and "Freedom of Jerusalem," challenging Roman authority and embodying the Jewish people's messianic hopes.
Artistry: The coin's artistry reflects necessity and fervent nationalistic expression. Struck by anonymous Jewish artisans, often on re-purposed Roman provincial bronzes, the designs are profoundly symbolic. The obverse typically features a majestic Temple facade, often with the Ark, while the reverse displays sacred cultic objects like a lulav and etrog. Inscriptions, in paleo-Hebrew, declare "Simeon" and "Year One of the Redemption of Israel," underscoring the revolt's spiritual and political aspirations.
Technical/Grading: As emergency coinage, Bar Kokhba bronzes often exhibit hurried production characteristics. This 34.6 gram, 32 mm example is assessed for the clarity of its high-points: the Temple facade's columns, architrave, Ark details, and the lulav and etrog's fronds and texture. Common technical qualities include undertypes from the original Roman flan, off-center strikes, and uneven flan thickness. A well-centered strike with full details and legible inscriptions is highly prized, despite this insurgent mintage's inherent challenges.