Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Hybrid Tetradrachm - Pantaleon & Agathocles Scythian Imitation

Uitgever Indo-Greek Kingdom
Jaar 150 BC - 50 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Tetradrachm (4)
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Diademed and draped bust of Agathokles facing right, rendered in the Hellenistic portrait tradition with strong facial relief. The king wears a royal diadem with visible ties, and his bust is clad in a chlamys. The portrait displays a robust, mature effigy with pronounced features characteristic of late Bactrian-Indo-Greek coinage. The Greek legend is distributed around the bust within the coin's field.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Greek
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

This coin belongs to a peculiar category of posthumous imitations produced in the Scythian frontier zones, blending the monetary authority of two distinct Indo-Greek kings — Pantaleon and Agathocles — whose reigns are themselves among the most debated in Bactrian scholarship. Both rulers issued the first known coins with Brahmi and Kharosthi inscriptions, suggesting deep administrative engagement with Indian populations, yet here their types were appropriated by non-Greek issuers operating well outside the original mint infrastructure.

The century-wide attribution window reflects genuine scholarly uncertainty — no hoard context has yet fixed the production of these hybrids to a tighter chronology.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT