Danh mục
| Đơn vị phát hành | Tegea |
|---|---|
| Năm | 50 BC - 25 BC |
| Loại | Standard circulation coin |
| Mệnh giá | 1 Hexachalkon = ¾ Obol = 1/8 Drachm |
| Tiền tệ | Drachm |
| Chất liệu | Bronze |
| Trọng lượng | 4.93 g |
| Đường kính | 22.0 mm |
| Độ dày | |
| Hình dạng | Round (irregular) |
| Kỹ thuật | Hammered |
| Hướng | |
| Nghệ nhân khắc | |
| Lưu hành đến | |
| Tài liệu tham khảo | SNG Copenhagen#314-315, BCD Peloponnesos#1750 |
| Mô tả mặt trước | Head of Aleos right, wearing tainia |
|---|---|
| Chữ viết mặt trước | |
| Chữ khắc mặt trước | |
| Mô tả mặt sau | Kepheos, nude but for helmet, standing facing right, holding a shield and a spear, extending hand to Athena, who stands left, holding a spear and a lock of Medusa’s hair. Between them, Sterope standing right, holding a vessel. Monograms above and below. |
| Chữ viết mặt sau | |
| Chữ khắc mặt sau | |
| Cạnh | |
| Xưởng đúc | |
| Số lượng đúc |
ND (50 BC - 25 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 8215986290 |
| Thông tin bổ sung |
Historical Context: Tegea, a significant Arcadian city, issued this hexachalkon between 50 BC and 25 BC, a pivotal era from the late Roman Republic to the Augustan Principate. While under Roman hegemony, Greek cities like Tegea maintained local bronze coinage for internal commerce. This coin underscores Tegea's enduring civic identity and economic autonomy, a tangible artifact from a period of immense political transformation and Roman consolidation.
Artistry: Anonymous engravers typically adhered to late Hellenistic artistic conventions for Tegean hexachalka. Designs commonly featured local deities or civic symbols. Given Tegea's heritage, the obverse likely portrayed a bust of Athena Alea, the city's patron goddess, rendered in a provincial yet naturalistic style. The reverse usually displayed an accompanying symbol or inscription, confirming minting authority and preserving established iconographic types.
Technical/Grading: This bronze hexachalkon, 4.93 grams and 22.0 millimeters, exhibits characteristics common to provincial Roman bronze issues. High-points, like a deity's helmet or facial features, are often prone to weakness or wear. Flan preparation varied, often resulting in shape irregularity. Surface preservation, especially an even patina, is crucial for grading; inherent bronze corrosion can obscure details. Well-centered strikes with strong relief are prized; off-centering or flatness are frequently observed.