Catálogo
| Emisor | Tegea |
|---|---|
| Año | 50 BC - 25 BC |
| Tipo | Standard circulation coin |
| Valor | 1 Hexachalkon = ¾ Obol = 1/8 Drachm |
| Moneda | Drachm |
| Composición | Bronze |
| Peso | 4.93 g |
| Diámetro | 22.0 mm |
| Grosor | |
| Forma | Round (irregular) |
| Técnica | Hammered |
| Orientación | |
| Grabador(es) | |
| En circulación hasta | |
| Referencia(s) | SNG Copenhagen#314-315, BCD Peloponnesos#1750 |
| Descripción del anverso | Head of Aleos right, wearing tainia |
|---|---|
| Escritura del anverso | |
| Leyenda del anverso | |
| Descripción del reverso | Kepheos, nude but for helmet, standing facing right, holding a shield and a spear, extending hand to Athena, who stands left, holding a spear and a lock of Medusa’s hair. Between them, Sterope standing right, holding a vessel. Monograms above and below. |
| Escritura del reverso | |
| Leyenda del reverso | |
| Canto | |
| Casa de moneda | |
| Tirada |
ND (50 BC - 25 BC) - - |
| ID de Numisquare | 8215986290 |
| Información adicional |
Historical Context: Tegea, a significant Arcadian city, issued this hexachalkon between 50 BC and 25 BC, a pivotal era from the late Roman Republic to the Augustan Principate. While under Roman hegemony, Greek cities like Tegea maintained local bronze coinage for internal commerce. This coin underscores Tegea's enduring civic identity and economic autonomy, a tangible artifact from a period of immense political transformation and Roman consolidation.
Artistry: Anonymous engravers typically adhered to late Hellenistic artistic conventions for Tegean hexachalka. Designs commonly featured local deities or civic symbols. Given Tegea's heritage, the obverse likely portrayed a bust of Athena Alea, the city's patron goddess, rendered in a provincial yet naturalistic style. The reverse usually displayed an accompanying symbol or inscription, confirming minting authority and preserving established iconographic types.
Technical/Grading: This bronze hexachalkon, 4.93 grams and 22.0 millimeters, exhibits characteristics common to provincial Roman bronze issues. High-points, like a deity's helmet or facial features, are often prone to weakness or wear. Flan preparation varied, often resulting in shape irregularity. Surface preservation, especially an even patina, is crucial for grading; inherent bronze corrosion can obscure details. Well-centered strikes with strong relief are prized; off-centering or flatness are frequently observed.