カタログ
| 発行体 | Tenos |
|---|---|
| 年号 | 520 BC - 500 BC |
| 種類 | Standard circulation coin |
| 額面 | Hemidrachm (1/2) |
| 通貨 | Drachm |
| 材質 | Silver |
| 重量 | 2.45 g |
| 直径 | |
| 厚さ | |
| 形状 | Round (irregular) |
| 製造技法 | Hammered, Incuse |
| 向き | |
| 彫刻師 | |
| 流通終了年 | |
| 参考文献 | SNG Copenhagen#767 |
| 表面の説明 | Bunch of grapes |
|---|---|
| 表面の文字体系 | |
| 表面の銘文 | |
| 裏面の説明 | Rough incuse square |
| 裏面の文字体系 | |
| 裏面の銘文 | |
| 縁 | |
| 鋳造所 | |
| 鋳造数 |
ND (520 BC - 500 BC) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 8923215610 |
| 追加情報 |
Historical Context: This silver hemidrachm, minted by the island city-state of Tenos between 520 and 500 BC, belongs to the early Archaic period of Greek numismatics. During this era, Tenos, a significant member of the Cyclades, was developing its autonomous economic identity, moving beyond simple barter. While no single ruler is associated with its issuance, the coin represents the collective authority and burgeoning prosperity of the Tenian polis, reflecting its participation in Aegean trade networks and its growing status as an independent entity, particularly known for its viticulture and the worship of Dionysus.
Artistry: The anonymous engraver of this period worked within the nascent Archaic stylistic school. Designs from Tenos commonly feature symbols reflecting its primary economic and religious associations, such as a kantharos (wine cup) or a bunch of grapes, often rendered with a robust, somewhat schematic elegance characteristic of the era. The artistry, while not yet exhibiting the naturalism of the Classical period, demonstrates a clear, powerful symbolic representation. The figures or objects are typically bold, occupying the flan effectively, conveying the city's identity through recognizable iconography rather than intricate detail.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a relatively thick, often irregular silver flan weighing 2.45 grams, this hemidrachm exemplifies early striking techniques. High-points, such as the rim of a kantharos or the individual grapes, are frequently susceptible to wear or weakness of strike. Early Archaic issues often display minor off-centering or areas of flat strike, a result of manual striking methods. However, the metal quality is consistently high, indicating a reliable currency standard. A well-preserved example would show strong detail on the primary device and legible ethnic (if present), with minimal evidence of double striking.