Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Gadahaiya Paisa Paramaras of Malwa or Silaharas of Kokan

Uitgever Gadhaiya
Jaar 1200-1300
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde 1 Drachm
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Stylized, highly degenerate bust of a king facing right, rendered in the Indo-Sassanian tradition. The effigy retains vestigial features of the original Sassanian royal portrait, including a schematic diadem or crown, though reduced to abstract linear forms through successive imitative coining. The field is flat and unadorned, consistent with the billon fabric characteristic of late Gadhaiya issues. This coin type was produced in Chaulukya territory from circa 543 AD and continued under successor dynasties including the Paramaras, Yadavas, and Silaharas across Gujarat, Malwa, Khandesh, and the Deccan.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (1200-1300) - 13th century;
Aanvullende informatie

The Gadhaiya (or Gadahaiya) coinage is a long-lived debased series descended ultimately from Sasanian drachms, filtered through centuries of imitation and re-imitation across western and central India. By the 13th century the prototype had degraded so thoroughly through successive copying that the original Sasanian imagery was nearly unrecognizable. The attribution to Paramaras of Malwa or Silaharas of Kokan reflects genuine scholarly uncertainty — the type circulated across overlapping territories and was struck by multiple regional authorities, making firm attribution to a single issuer difficult without die-study or find-spot evidence.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT