Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Morocco |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1573-1574 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Dinar (1549-1659) |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Three lines of Arabic script legend contained within a double circular border. The legend reads 'Struck in Fas (Fez), year one,' referencing the first regnal year of the issuing sultan. The inscription is struck on an irregularly shaped copper flan typical of hammered Moroccan falus coinage of the Saadian period. The lettering is bold but slightly off-center, consistent with hand-struck production methods of the era. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | ضرب بفاس عام أحد (Translation: Mint in Fas (Fez) year One) |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Al-Mutawwakil's reign was fractured and contested — he ruled Morocco twice, losing the throne to his uncle Abd al-Malik in 1576 and then dying at the Battle of Alcácer Quibir in 1578, the three-way engagement that also killed King Sebastian I of Portugal and effectively ended the Aviz dynasty. Copper falus of this period circulated at the lowest register of Saadian economic life, and attributing them to specific reigns often rests on subtle epigraphic differences rather than explicit mint marks.