See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Fals

Issuer Samarqand, City of
Year 1427-1429
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Arabic numeral legend occupying the central field, recording the regnal or Hijri year of issue. The inscription is rendered in bold, somewhat angular script characteristic of Timurid copper fals coinage, arranged across multiple lines within the field. The strike is uneven, as typical of hammered copper issues, with portions of the legend showing variable depth of relief. Decorative dots or pellets serve as word dividers within the inscription. The irregular flan edges are clearly visible around the periphery.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Samarqand
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Samarqand in the 1420s was still operating under the long shadow of Timur, though by this point his son Shah Rukh controlled the eastern Timurid domains from Herat while Ulugh Beg governed Samarqand as governor — a relationship that was politically functional but perpetually tense. The city's copper coinage from this window reflects local administrative independence; fals issues were struck to meet small-transaction demand that silver tanga could not practically serve.

Zeno 21600 documents this piece within a series where attribution to specific regnal years remains contested among specialists, the 1427–1429 bracket reflecting the outer limits of current scholarly consensus rather than a confirmed date.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE