Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Roman Imperial Mint |
|---|---|
| Year | 130-133 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Denarius, Reform of Augustus (27 BC – AD 215) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (130-133) |
| Additional information |
The "RESTITVTOR" series — struck in the early 130s following Hadrian's extensive provincial tours — commemorates his visits to nearly every corner of the empire between roughly 121 and 132 AD. Hispania received particular attention: Hadrian himself was born at Italica in the province, and the restoration rhetoric carried personal weight beyond the usual imperial flattery. Whether the coins circulated heavily in Hispania itself or remained largely a Rome-struck gesture is debated, but provincial finds suggest genuine distribution.
RIC II.3 1864 encompasses both dupondius and as attributions, a classification ambiguity that persists because surface patination frequently obscures the orichalcum-versus-copper distinction essential for separating the two denominations.