Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Gelderland, Province of |
|---|---|
| Year | 1659-1680 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 1 Ducaton (3) |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Dog Harderwijk, Netherlands(1343-1802) |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Piedforts were never intended for commerce. Provincial mints produced them as presentation pieces — gifts to magistrates, foreign dignitaries, or mint officials — and Gelderland's double-weight Ducaton examples from this period follow that tradition precisely. The Silver Rider ducaton itself was a workhorse trade coin, but a piedfort at 65.5 grams occupied an entirely different social register.
Gelderland was among the more assertive of the Seven Provinces in maintaining its own minting identity well into the latter seventeenth century, resisting pressure toward monetary uniformity even as Holland dominated the Republic's finances.