Drachm - Hunnic tribes Kidarites Sassanian style, Varhran /Bahram/ IV imitation, Taxila mint

Emitent Kidarite Kingdom
Rok 388-399
Typ Standard circulation coin
Hodnota Drachm (1)
Měna Drachm (380-477)
Složení Silver
Hmotnost 3.53 g
Průměr 26 mm
Tloušťka
Tvar Round (irregular)
Technika Hammered
Orientace Coin alignment ↑↓
Rytci
V oběhu do
Reference SNS Schaaf#III, Göbl Kushan#pl. 6, VII-4
Popis líce Bust of Varhran /Bahram/ IV
Písmo líce
Opis líce
Popis rubu Fire altar
Písmo rubu
Opis rubu
Hrana Plain
Mincovna
Náklad ND (388-399) - Taxila mint -
ID Numisquare 1403231440
Další informace

Historical Context: This silver drachm, minted at Taxila (388-399 CE), represents a pivotal era for the Kidarite Kingdom. A powerful Hunnic tribe, the Kidarites asserted dominance in Gandhara and Punjab, challenging Sasanian authority. Imitating Sasanian Varhran IV's coinage, this issue signifies the Kidarites' strategic adoption of established regional monetary systems. It legitimized their rule and facilitated commerce, reflecting their sovereignty and adaptation of foreign numismatic styles in expanding territories.

Artistry: Adhering to Sasanian artistic tradition, the coin features a regal bust on the obverse and a Zoroastrian fire altar on the reverse. While inspired by Varhran IV's prototypes, the Kidarite rendition from the Taxila mint exhibits a distinct stylistic interpretation. Local engravers adapted Sasanian iconography, often resulting in a more stylized or simplified aesthetic compared to official Sasanian issues. This artistic adaptation subtly infused Kidarite cultural identity into the recognized Sasanian numismatic language.

Technical/Grading: Struck on a 26 mm flan and weighing 3.53 grams, this drachm fits the type's expected parameters, though slightly lighter than some contemporary Sasanian issues. High-points for preservation include the crown's intricate details, the ruler's facial features, and the fire altar's flame. As an imitation, strike quality varies; well-preserved examples show competent strikes, though often with some flattening or less precise rendering of finer details compared to Sasanian originals. Attribution is confirmed by SNS Schaaf#III and Göbl Kushan#pl. 6, VII-4.

×