Katalog
| Emitent | Kings of Cappadokia |
|---|---|
| Rok | 63 BC - 51 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nominał | 1 Drachm |
| Waluta | Drachm |
| Skład | Silver |
| Waga | 3.51 g |
| Średnica | 17 mm |
| Grubość | |
| Kształt | Round (irregular) |
| Technika | Hammered |
| Orientacja | |
| Rytownik(zy) | |
| W obiegu do | |
| Źródło(a) |
| Opis awersu | Diademed head right. |
|---|---|
| Pismo awersu | |
| Legenda awersu | |
| Opis rewersu | Athena standing left, holding Nike and resting other hand on shield with spear. |
| Pismo rewersu | Greek |
| Legenda rewersu | ΒΑΣΙΛEΩΣ ΑΡΙOBARZANOV ΦIΛOΠATOPOΣ |
| Krawędź | |
| Mennica | |
| Nakład |
ND (63 BC - 51 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 8210458410 |
| Dodatkowe informacje |
Historical Context: This silver drachm was issued by Ariobarzanes II Philopator, King of Cappadocia (63-51 BC). His reign occurred during a critical phase of increasing Roman influence in Asia Minor. As a Roman client king, his rule was marked by instability and reliance on Roman patronage. His assassination highlights the precarious autonomy of regional rulers under burgeoning Roman imperial power, making these coins crucial numismatic evidence of a kingdom navigating complex geopolitical pressures.
Artistry: The coin's design reflects established Hellenistic stylistic conventions, likely by local Cappadocian engravers. The obverse features a diademed portrait of Ariobarzanes II facing right, displaying idealized yet individualized royal features. The reverse consistently depicts Athena Nikephoros seated left, holding Nike and a spear, with a shield. This iconic imagery linked the ruler to divine favor and military success, reinforcing legitimacy, often inscribed ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ ΑΡΙΟΒΑΡΖΑΝΟΥ ΦΙΛΟΠΑΤΟΡΟΣ.
Technical/Grading: Struck in silver, this drachm measures 17 millimeters and weighs 3.51 grams, consistent with Cappadocian standards. High-points for wear on the obverse include the hair over the forehead and the diadem. On the reverse, critical areas are Athena's knee, helmet, and the Nike figure. Strike quality varies; optimal examples show sharp details on both portraiture and reverse iconography with good centering. Less precise strikes may exhibit off-centering or weaker reverse details, typical for issues of this era.