Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Drachm

Uitgever Uncertain Bactrian city (Baktria)
Jaar 285 BC - 278 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Drachm (305-15BC)
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde An eagle stands facing left in three-quarter view, rendered with bold, granular feathering across the wings and breast, its hooked beak open and head turned slightly upward. To the upper right of the field, a grape cluster suspended from a vine branch with leaves is depicted, serving as a civic or mint symbol. A small symbol, possibly a monogram or control mark, appears in the upper right field above the vine. The composition fills the flan with confident, if somewhat provincial, die-cutting consistent with a local Bactrian workshop imitating Seleucid or earlier Achaemenid-era Greek coinage traditions.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Plain
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

The attribution "uncertain Bactrian city" reflects a genuine unresolved debate in the scholarship — Bactria during this period was nominally under Seleucid control following the partition after Ipsus, but local civic minting persisted in ways that central authority either tolerated or simply could not suppress. Syros 63–64 groups these pieces by die linkage rather than by any secure findspot or mint signature, which is why the issuer remains unresolved.

The date range places production squarely within Antiochus I's eastern campaigns to consolidate inherited Seleucid territory — a period of administrative turbulence that likely accounts for the survival of independent civic coinage this far east.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT