Vollständige Bilder anzeigen — kostenlose Registrierung
Mit Google fortfahren — kostenlos oder mit E-Mail registrieren

Drachm

Emittent Uncertain Philistian city
Jahr 450 BC - 333 BC
Typ Standard circulation coin
Nennwert Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Währung Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Material Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Gewicht Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Durchmesser Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Dicke Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Form Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Prägetechnik Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Ausrichtung Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Stempelschneider Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Im Umlauf bis Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Referenz(en) Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Aversbeschreibung Bearded male head facing right, rendered in an orientalizing style characteristic of Philistian coinage. The hair is elaborately dressed in tightly arranged curls with a distinctive tiara-like headband, reflecting strong Near Eastern artistic influence. The facial features are boldly modeled with a prominent nose, defined eye rendered with an almond-shaped outline, and a short beard. The field is plain, and the design is contained within a dotted border visible on portions of the flan.
Aversschrift Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Averslegende Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Reversbeschreibung Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Reversschrift Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Reverslegende Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Rand Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Prägestätte Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Auflage ND (450 BC - 333 BC)
Zusätzliche Informationen

Philistian coinage of this period exists in a documentary vacuum — no ancient source names the issuing authority, and the cities most often proposed (Gaza, Ashkelon, Ashdod) have never been confirmed through controlled archaeological excavation of a mint site. These coins circulated in a region that sat between competing Persian administrative zones and the commercial pull of Athenian trade, which explains why so many Philistian types borrow directly from Athenian prototypes while quietly inserting local iconographic elements. The Gitler and Tal corpus remains the definitive organizing framework precisely because no other classification has managed to sort the die evidence with comparable rigor.

XXVII.9D is among the rarer die pairings in the group.