Catalog
| Issuer | Cenomani |
|---|---|
| Year | 200 BC - 101 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (200 BC - 101 BC) |
| Additional information |
The Cenomani occupied territory in Cisalpine Gaul — roughly modern Lombardy — and maintained enough political coherence under Roman expansion to continue issuing their own coinage well into the second century BC. Their silver drachms derive from Massalian prototypes, a borrowing pattern common among Gallic tribes who absorbed Greek monetary conventions through trade rather than conquest. By the time this issue was struck, Roman authority over the region was already tightening following the lex Flamininia of 232 BC and subsequent colonization pressure.
The LT 2126 variety designation signals a departure from the core type — exact nature depending on die axis or subsidiary symbol — which complicates precise attribution without direct comparison to the Budapest reference specimen.