Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Drachm
| Uitgever | Uncertain Cisalpine Gallic tribes |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 250 BC - 200 BC |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Hammered |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | A lion passant to the right rendered in a schematized Celtic style derived from the Massalian prototype, with exaggerated musculature and a curling tail. Below the lion's body, a crayfish (astacus) motif is visible, a diagnostic feature of this 'crayfish type' series. Above the lion, a partial Greek legend appears in the upper field, heavily degenerated from the original Massalian inscription. The overall design is stylistically abstracted, reflecting Celtic reinterpretation of the Greek Massalia coinage prototype. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | ΜΑΣΣΑ (Translation: Marseille.) |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The Cisalpine Gauls — settled across the Po Valley from roughly the fourth century BC onward — struck imitative silver coinage derived from Massaliot and ultimately Rhodian prototypes, adapting Greek monetary forms to serve exchange needs among communities with no indigenous coinage tradition of their own. Attribution remains genuinely contested; "uncertain" in this context is not scholarly hedging but an honest reflection of how poorly tribal boundaries and minting activity can be correlated archaeologically in this region.
The CCCBM corpus (Celtic Coins and related material from Britain and Ireland, extended to continental types) remains the principal reference for systematic die-study of these issues. CCCBM 1#II-7 places this piece within a specific die group, which is the most precise attribution the evidence currently permits.