Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | France |
|---|---|
| Year | 1540-1547 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | 0.66 g |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Two fleurs-de-lis arranged side by side in the central field, a characteristic device of the French royal coinage of the period. The surrounding Latin legend reads D FRANCISCVS D G R L, identifying Francis I as King of France by the grace of God. The flan is irregular in shape, typical of hammered coinage of this era, and the strike is somewhat weak at the periphery. The design is rendered in a simple, flat relief consistent with small-denomination billon issues of the mid-sixteenth century. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Francis I introduced this fourth type of the double tournois late in his reign, a period consumed by the Italian Wars and mounting fiscal pressure from decades of conflict with Charles V. The billon content of small divisional coinage was routinely debased during these years as the crown extracted what metal value it could from the circulating currency without resorting to outright token issues.
The Gadoury rarity rating of R1 indicates genuine scarcity — not collector inflation. Ciani's silence on this type suggests it fell outside the scope of his corpus or that attributable examples were simply too few to classify with confidence.