Catálogo
| Emissor | Ghaznavid dynasty |
|---|---|
| Ano | 998-1030 |
| Tipo | Standard circulation coin |
| Valor | Dirham (0.7) |
| Moeda | Dinar (977-1186) |
| Composição | Silver |
| Peso | 2.57 g |
| Diâmetro | 19 mm |
| Espessura | 0.8 mm |
| Formato | Round (irregular) |
| Técnica | |
| Orientação | |
| Gravador(es) | |
| Em circulação até | |
| Referência(s) |
| Descrição do anverso | عدل / لا إله إلا / الله وحده / لا شريكه له `adl / la ilah illa / Allah wahdahu / la sherikh lahu |
|---|---|
| Escrita do anverso | Arabic |
| Legenda do anverso |
(Translation: I say / There is no god but to God alone / no partner to him) |
| Descrição do reverso | لله / محمد رسول الله/ القادر باللہ/ یمین الدولہ / محمود Lillah / Muhammad rasul Allah /Al Qadir Billah/Yamin al-Dawla / Mahmud |
| Escrita do reverso | Arabic |
| Legenda do reverso | |
| Bordo | |
| Casa da moeda | |
| Tiragem |
ND (998-1030) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 5460266780 |
| Informações adicionais |
Historical Context: This silver dirham, issued by Mahmud of Ghazni (998-1030 AD), epitomizes the apex of the Ghaznavid dynasty's power. Mahmud forged a vast empire from Persia to northern India, asserting de facto independence from the Abbasid Caliphate. These coins served as crucial instruments for economic control and propaganda, reflecting the dynasty's wealth from conquests and trade, and its role as a champion of Sunni Islam.
Artistry: The design adheres strictly to the aniconic principles of Islamic coinage, emphasizing intricate Arabic calligraphy. While specific engravers are rarely known, the style reflects the prevailing Kufic script, characterized by its angular and elegant form. The obverse typically features the Kalima (Shahada) and sometimes a Quranic quotation. The reverse prominently displays Mahmud's name and titles, such as Yamin al-Dawla, alongside the mint name and date, rendered to convey legitimacy.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 2.57 grams and measuring 19 millimeters, this dirham conforms to standard Ghaznavid specifications. High-points for wear assessment are primarily the raised elements of the calligraphy, especially the central legends and taller vertical strokes. Technical strike quality varies, but well-struck examples exhibit sharp, full legends. Marginal legends often show weakness due to uneven striking pressure or die erosion. Flan integrity and centering are key indicators.