Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Ilkhanate |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1262-1281 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Round |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Arabic |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Plain |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The anonymous Tiflis dirhams of the early Ilkhanate period reflect a deliberate political ambiguity: the khans who struck them — Hulagu and his immediate successors — had not yet committed publicly to Islam, and omitting the ruler's name from the coinage avoided the theologically loaded implications of a non-Muslim name appearing on currency handled by a largely Muslim population. Tiflis, captured in 1256, was one of the few Georgian urban mints the Ilkhans kept operational, its output serving a Caucasian commercial zone that had used silver dirhams continuously since the early Abbasid period.
Album's type 2 distinction separates this issue from the slightly earlier anonymous fabric by differences in the kalima arrangement and marginal inscription layout.