Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Ilkhanate |
|---|---|
| Year | 1262-1281 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Round |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Arabic |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The anonymous Tiflis dirhams of the early Ilkhanate period reflect a deliberate political ambiguity: the khans who struck them — Hulagu and his immediate successors — had not yet committed publicly to Islam, and omitting the ruler's name from the coinage avoided the theologically loaded implications of a non-Muslim name appearing on currency handled by a largely Muslim population. Tiflis, captured in 1256, was one of the few Georgian urban mints the Ilkhans kept operational, its output serving a Caucasian commercial zone that had used silver dirhams continuously since the early Abbasid period.
Album's type 2 distinction separates this issue from the slightly earlier anonymous fabric by differences in the kalima arrangement and marginal inscription layout.