Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Kidarite Kingdom |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 350-385 |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Dinar (20) |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Full standing effigy of the king Kidara I facing left, depicted in royal Kushano-Sasanian style with elaborate headdress and billowing drapery. The ruler is shown wearing a long robe adorned with pellet ornaments, holding what appears to be a sceptre or sacrificial implement. A Brahmi legend reading KIDARA KUSHANA is positioned in the field. The overall style reflects the late Kushan artistic tradition, rendered in high-relief hammered gold with characteristic stylised drapery folds. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversschrift | Bactrian |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
The Kidarites emerged as the Kushano-Sasanian administration collapsed under pressure from their own eastward advance, and Kidara I is generally credited as the dynasty's founder or consolidator — the historical record is thin enough that scholars still argue both points. These dinars imitate the late Kushan gold coinage so closely that attribution long remained confused, and many pieces sat misidentified in older collections under Kushan kings they were never struck by.
The Gandhara mint attribution distinguishes this issue from related Bactrian-region strikes, a separation made possible largely through die studies and find-spot analysis rather than explicit mint marks.