Katalog
| Emitent | Arados |
|---|---|
| Rok | 186 BC - 185 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nominał | Dichalkon (1⁄24) |
| Waluta | Drachm |
| Skład | Bronze |
| Waga | 3.51 g |
| Średnica | 13.8 mm |
| Grubość | |
| Kształt | Round (irregular) |
| Technika | Hammered |
| Orientacja | Medal alignment ↑↑ |
| Rytownik(zy) | |
| W obiegu do | |
| Źródło(a) | GCV#6000, BMC Greek#103 |
| Opis awersu | Bust of Tyche right, turreted, palm-leaf behind. |
|---|---|
| Pismo awersu | |
| Legenda awersu | |
| Opis rewersu | Prow of galley left; above, Phoenician letters AP ligate between two letters read from right to left; below, year of issue in Phoenician numerals. |
| Pismo rewersu | |
| Legenda rewersu | Γ AP O |
| Krawędź | |
| Mennica | |
| Nakład |
ND (186 BC - 185 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 4549873880 |
| Dodatkowe informacje |
Historical Context: This bronze dichalkos, issued by the Phoenician city of Arados between 186 and 185 BC, dates to a pivotal period in the Hellenistic East. Following the Treaty of Apamea in 188 BC, which significantly curtailed Seleucid power, Arados, an island city renowned for its naval strength and mercantile prowess, asserted greater autonomy. This coinage reflects Arados's identity as a dominant maritime power, essential for its extensive trade networks and strategic position in the eastern Mediterranean.
Artistry: The obverse design features a meticulously rendered prow of a galley, a potent symbol of Aradian naval might and commercial enterprise. While specific engravers are rarely identifiable on Hellenistic bronzes, the execution adheres to the broader Hellenistic stylistic school, emphasizing realism and functional representation. The design effectively conveys the robust construction of a warship's ram, a testament to the city's maritime engineering and military capabilities.
Technical/Grading: Struck in bronze, weighing 3.51 grams and measuring 13.8 millimeters, this dichalkos represents a common small denomination. Key high-points susceptible to wear include the ram and any decorative elements on the upper section of the prow. Well-preserved examples exhibit clear details of the prow's structure, including the eye and ramming beak. Strike quality can vary, with superior examples showing good centering and a full impression of the intricate naval design on a well-prepared flan.