Catalog
| Issuer | Arados |
|---|---|
| Year | 241 BC - 162 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Dichalkon (1⁄24) |
| Currency | Drachm |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Weight | 3.6 g |
| Diameter | 17 mm |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | SNG Copenhagen#26, BMC Greek#89, BMC Greek#90 |
| Obverse description | Bust of Tyche right, turreted, palm-leaf behind. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | |
| Obverse lettering | |
| Reverse description | Prow of galley left; above, Phoenician letters AP ligate |
| Reverse script | Phoenician |
| Reverse lettering |
AP (Translation: Arados) |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (241 BC - 162 BC) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 1546990100 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: This Dichalkos was issued by Arados, a prominent Phoenician island city, during a period of significant autonomy from 241 BC to 162 BC. Strategically located, Arados thrived as a major maritime power and trading hub. While often under Seleucid influence, Arados frequently asserted its independence, reflected in its prolific coinage. Bronze denominations like this Dichalkos underscored the city's robust local economy, meeting demand for small change and supporting its extensive trade networks.
Artistry: The obverse features the distinctive galley prow, a potent symbol of Arados's naval strength and maritime identity. While the engraver remains anonymous, typical for ancient bronzes, the stylistic execution aligns with Hellenistic tradition, emphasizing naturalism and dynamic composition. The prow would have been rendered with details like the ramming beak and decorative elements. The reverse typically depicted a local emblem, such as a palm tree or goat, grounding the coin in Aradian culture.
Technical/Grading: Struck in bronze, this Dichalkos measures 17 mm and weighs 3.6 grams. Key high-points susceptible to wear on the obverse include the galley's ram and decorative prow features. On the reverse, the central emblem's details would show wear first. Ancient bronze coinage frequently exhibits variable strike quality; off-center strikes, uneven pressure, and die wear are common. Original surface preservation, or fabric, is crucial for grading, as bronze is prone to corrosion, obscuring details and impacting appeal.