Dichalkon - Tigranes I Zeus

Issuer Armenia, Kingdom of
Year 123 BC - 96 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Dichalkon (1⁄24)
Currency Drachm
Composition Bronze
Weight 6.35 g
Diameter 18 mm
Thickness
Shape Round (irregular)
Technique Hammered
Orientation
Engraver(s)
In circulation to
Reference(s) Kovacs#65, Bedoukian CAA#4
Obverse description Head of Tigranes I to left, wearing four-pointed tiara tied with a diadem.
Obverse script
Obverse lettering
Reverse description Zeus seated to left, holding wreath in his right hand and scepter in his left; in inner left field, Λ.
Reverse script
Reverse lettering BA[ΣΙΛEΩΣ] / [M]EΓAΛO[Y] - TIΓPANOY / ΦΙΛΕΛΛHN[OC]
Edge
Mint
Mintage ND (123 BC - 96 BC) - -
Numisquare ID 7938026210
Additional information

Historical Context: This Dichalkon was issued by Tigranes I of the Kingdom of Armenia (123 BC - 96 BC). This era marks Armenia's ascent as a regional power. The "Tigranes I Zeus" type reflects early numismatic efforts to establish distinct royal iconography. Adopting Zeus on coinage highlights profound Hellenistic influence on the Armenian court, asserting the king's divine right to rule within a recognized cultural framework, laying foundations for future expansion.

Artistry: The artistic style of this Dichalkon is firmly rooted in the Hellenistic tradition. Though the engraver is anonymous, the design reflects skilled craftsmanship. The obverse features a diademed portrait of Tigranes I, idealized for regal authority. The reverse prominently displays Zeus, typically enthroned, holding an eagle and scepter—a potent symbol of sovereignty and divine protection. This fusion of royal portraiture with a Greek deity illustrates Armenia's strategic embrace of Hellenistic cultural forms to legitimize imperial ambitions.

Technical/Grading: As a bronze Dichalkon (6.35 gg, 18 mm), this coin often exhibits characteristics common to ancient bronze issues. High-points for strike quality include the king's diadem, facial features, and Zeus's head and attributes. However, bronze coinage frequently shows less precise striking, including minor off-center strikes or areas of weakness. Surface condition and a stable patina are crucial for grading; corrosion is a common concern. References Kovacs#65 and Bedoukian CAA#4 confirm its authenticity and numismatic significance.

×