Dichalkon - Tigranes I Zeus

Emittent Armenia, Kingdom of
Jahr 123 BC - 96 BC
Typ Standard circulation coin
Nennwert Dichalkon (1⁄24)
Währung Drachm
Material Bronze
Gewicht 6.35 g
Durchmesser 18 mm
Dicke
Form Round (irregular)
Prägetechnik Hammered
Ausrichtung
Stempelschneider
Im Umlauf bis
Referenz(en) Kovacs#65, Bedoukian CAA#4
Aversbeschreibung Head of Tigranes I to left, wearing four-pointed tiara tied with a diadem.
Aversschrift
Averslegende
Reversbeschreibung Zeus seated to left, holding wreath in his right hand and scepter in his left; in inner left field, Λ.
Reversschrift
Reverslegende BA[ΣΙΛEΩΣ] / [M]EΓAΛO[Y] - TIΓPANOY / ΦΙΛΕΛΛHN[OC]
Rand
Prägestätte
Auflage ND (123 BC - 96 BC) - -
Numisquare-ID 7938026210
Zusätzliche Informationen

Historical Context: This Dichalkon was issued by Tigranes I of the Kingdom of Armenia (123 BC - 96 BC). This era marks Armenia's ascent as a regional power. The "Tigranes I Zeus" type reflects early numismatic efforts to establish distinct royal iconography. Adopting Zeus on coinage highlights profound Hellenistic influence on the Armenian court, asserting the king's divine right to rule within a recognized cultural framework, laying foundations for future expansion.

Artistry: The artistic style of this Dichalkon is firmly rooted in the Hellenistic tradition. Though the engraver is anonymous, the design reflects skilled craftsmanship. The obverse features a diademed portrait of Tigranes I, idealized for regal authority. The reverse prominently displays Zeus, typically enthroned, holding an eagle and scepter—a potent symbol of sovereignty and divine protection. This fusion of royal portraiture with a Greek deity illustrates Armenia's strategic embrace of Hellenistic cultural forms to legitimize imperial ambitions.

Technical/Grading: As a bronze Dichalkon (6.35 gg, 18 mm), this coin often exhibits characteristics common to ancient bronze issues. High-points for strike quality include the king's diadem, facial features, and Zeus's head and attributes. However, bronze coinage frequently shows less precise striking, including minor off-center strikes or areas of weakness. Surface condition and a stable patina are crucial for grading; corrosion is a common concern. References Kovacs#65 and Bedoukian CAA#4 confirm its authenticity and numismatic significance.

×