Katalog
| Emitent | Argos (Argolis) |
|---|---|
| Rok | 100 BC - 50 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Hodnota | Dichalkon (1⁄24) |
| Měna | Drachm |
| Složení | Bronze |
| Hmotnost | 3.19 g |
| Průměr | 15 mm |
| Tloušťka | |
| Tvar | Round (irregular) |
| Technika | Hammered |
| Orientace | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Rytci | |
| V oběhu do | |
| Reference | Peloponnesos#1156 Greek#144-145 Copenhagen#79 |
| Popis líce | Head of Hera right, wearing ornamented stephanos. |
|---|---|
| Písmo líce | |
| Opis líce | |
| Popis rubu | Pillar fountain; magistrate`s name in two lines across upper and lower fields; archaic heta to left, palm frond to right. |
| Písmo rubu | Greek |
| Opis rubu | AIΣXIΣ |
| Hrana | |
| Mincovna | |
| Náklad |
ND (100 BC - 50 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 2547024530 |
| Další informace |
Historical Context: The Dichalkon of Aischis from Argos, minted between 100 and 50 BC, reflects the continued civic autonomy of this ancient Peloponnesian city during the late Hellenistic period. While Roman power expanded across Greece, Argos, a venerable city-state, maintained its right to issue local bronze coinage. The magistrate Aischis, whose name appears, likely oversaw its production, signifying local authority and the city's economic needs for smaller denominations in daily commerce. This era saw a general shift to more prevalent bronze currency for internal trade.
Artistry: This bronze dichalkon, measuring 15 mm, exemplifies late Hellenistic Greek numismatic art. While the specific engraver remains anonymous, the design would typically feature local deities, such as Hera, Argos's patron goddess, or prominent mythological figures and civic symbols associated with the city's identity. The artistry, constrained by the small flan and bronze medium, aimed to convey cultural pride through recognizable iconography, often executed with a blend of classical tradition and emerging realism.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 3.19 grams, this dichalkon typically exhibits variable strike quality, characteristic of small bronze issues from this period. High-points of the design, such as hair or facial features, or raised elements of an emblem, are often susceptible to weak striking or flattening due to insufficient pressure or worn dies. Centering can be inconsistent. A well-preserved example would boast a clear strike on both sides, with legible legends and a pleasing natural patina.