Katalog
| Emittent | Priansos |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 320 BC - 270 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nennwert | Dichalkon (1⁄24) |
| Währung | Drachm |
| Material | Bronze |
| Gewicht | 5.24 g |
| Durchmesser | 18.0 mm |
| Dicke | |
| Form | Round (irregular) |
| Prägetechnik | Hammered |
| Ausrichtung | |
| Stempelschneider | |
| Im Umlauf bis | |
| Referenz(en) | SNG Copenhagen#548, SvoronosCr#17 |
| Aversbeschreibung | Head of Artemis to right, wearing pendant earring and pearl necklace, and with her hair tied in a bun at the top of her head |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | |
| Averslegende | |
| Reversbeschreibung | Date palm tree. To left, rudder and to right, dolphin swimming downwards |
| Reversschrift | Greek |
| Reverslegende | ΠΡΙΑΝCΙωΝ |
| Rand | |
| Prägestätte | |
| Auflage |
ND (320 BC - 270 BC) - - |
| Numisquare-ID | 2644197790 |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Historical Context: This Dichalkon was issued by Priansos, an independent polis on Crete, during the late Classical to early Hellenistic eras (320-270 BC). Crete at this time featured numerous self-governing city-states, maintaining distinct civic identities despite broader Hellenistic geopolitical shifts. Bronze coinage like this Dichalkon primarily facilitated local commerce and daily transactions within Priansos, complementing any higher-value silver issues.
Artistry: While the engraver is anonymous, this coin exemplifies Late Classical/Early Hellenistic Greek numismatic art. Cretan mints often developed unique artistic interpretations, blending local mythologies and symbols with broader Hellenic aesthetics. Typical bronze designs featured local patron deities, mythological figures pertinent to the city's foundation myths, or civic emblems, rendered with period-appropriate naturalism, though sometimes simplified for smaller flans.
Technical/Grading: Struck in bronze, this Dichalkon weighs 5.24 grams and measures 18.0 millimeters, consistent with its denomination. High points of the design, such as hair or prominent anatomical details, are critical for assessing wear and strike quality. Bronze issues often display variability in strike centering and flan preparation compared to silver. Its identification is firmly established by SNG Copenhagen#548 and SvoronosCr#17, confirming its numismatic significance.