Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Denier - Unknown ruler

Uitgever Unified Moravia and Margraviate
Jaar 1150-1170
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Moravian unspecified denars (1055-1190)
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde The reverse displays a mounted equestrian figure facing left, rendered in the schematic Romanesque style typical of Moravian deniers of the mid-12th century. The rider appears armored or cloaked, seated upon a horse shown in profile with legs extended in a galloping or striding posture. To the right of the horse, a large crescent or architectural element is visible, possibly representing a stylized banner or fortification. The die is crudely engraved with irregular flan edges and no discernible legend. The overall composition is consistent with the iconographic conventions of the Přemyslid-related Moravian coinage series.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Plain
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

VP#259 sits in a genuinely difficult stretch of Moravian numismatic history. The joint designation "Unified Moravia and Margraviate" reflects the political consolidation under the Přemyslid margraves, but attributing individual deniers from this two-decade window remains contested — Šmerda and Vojtíšek both proposed different rulership sequences, and the die evidence does not resolve the question cleanly.

Václav Pospíšil's corpus remains the standard reference precisely because no cleaner attribution has been achieved since its publication.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT