Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Olomouc, Duchy of |
|---|---|
| Year | 1095-1107 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Denier (1054-1197) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Central field features a stylized architectural or cross-topped tower motif, rendered in a primitive Romanesque manner typical of Bohemian-Moravian deniers of the late 11th century. A crescent or horseshoe-shaped element is visible below the central device, with further abstract ornamental details in the inner field. The design is enclosed within a beaded inner circle, surrounded by a fragmentary Latin legend along the coin's periphery. The flan is irregular and shows characteristic hammer-struck fabric with uneven surfaces. The overall style reflects the provincial workshop output associated with the Přemyslid appanage duchy of Olomouc. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Svatopluk of Olomouc ruled as duke under Bohemian suzerainty during one of the most turbulent periods of Přemyslid succession politics, eventually seizing the Bohemian ducal throne itself in 1107 — the same year this type's production ends. His assassination at the Diet of Merseburg in 1109 cut short a reign marked by near-constant dynastic conflict. Deniers attributable to his Olomouc period are poorly documented in surviving hoards, and the VP#128 attribution relies heavily on monogram analysis rather than any firm documentary record.