See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Denier - Stephen III

Issuer Hungary
Year 1162-1172
Type Log in to see details
Value Denier (Denár) (1)
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description A bold, equal-armed cross with flared terminals occupies the central field, enclosed within a plain inner circle. Four pellets are placed in the four quadrants formed by the arms of the cross, one in each quarter. The surrounding field between the inner circle and the beaded outer border is plain and unlettered. The design is characteristic of the anonymous, inscription-free deniers issued under the Árpád rulers during the mid-12th century. The flan shows typical hammered irregularity consistent with the period.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage ND (1162-1172)
Additional information

Stephen III came to power as a teenager in 1162 and spent much of his reign fighting off rival claimants — his uncles Stephen IV and Ladislaus II, both backed at various points by Byzantine Emperor Manuel I Komnenos, who had his own ambitions over Hungarian succession. The political instability meant royal authority was intermittently contested throughout the decade, and coinage from this reign reflects a fractured administrative period rather than a stable issuing program.

The catalog references here — particularly the CAC and EK designations — place this piece within a tightly sequenced typology that Hungarian specialists use to navigate what is otherwise a murky attribution landscape for 12th-century deniers.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE