Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Olomouc, Duchy of |
|---|---|
| Year | 1061-1087 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Denier (1054-1197) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Central motif consists of a cross pattée or floriated cross, with heart-shaped or trefoil terminals extending into each quadrant, forming a quatrefoil-like design within a plain inner circle. The cross is surrounded by a series of pellets or globules arranged around the inner ring, with further pellets punctuating the outer border. The overall composition is characteristic of Bohemian-Moravian Romanesque hammered deniers of the eleventh century. No legible inscription is present on this face. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Otto I ruled Olomouc as an appanage duchy under the Přemyslid system, which divided Bohemia's territories among male-line relatives rather than consolidating them under a single heir. His coinage was issued independently of Prague, reflecting the genuine fiscal autonomy these sub-duchies exercised in the latter half of the eleventh century. Cach 371 is among the better-documented Moravian denier attributions from this fragmented period, though die linkage studies have occasionally complicated the boundaries between his issues and those of his contemporaries in Brno and Znojmo.