Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
Denier - Odo I annulet
| Uitgever | Burgundy, Duchy of |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1079-1103 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Latin |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | A short cross pattée centered within a beaded circle, with a distinctive annulet placed in the third quadrant serving as the identifying mintmark for this type. The arms of the cross extend nearly to the beaded circle, dividing the field into four quadrants. The flan is irregular and the strike uneven, consistent with hammered feudal deniers of the period. The legend runs around the outer field referencing the Castle of Dijon. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Odo I consolidated Burgundian ducal authority during a period when the duchy sat uncomfortably between Capetian royal pressure from the north and the reforming influence of Cluny — barely forty kilometers from the ducal minting center at Dijon. Whether the annulet variety reflects a die-cutter's mark, a mint official's differencing tool, or something more deliberate remains unresolved; Dumas's own tentative attribution (note the query against the reference) suggests the classification is not settled.