Katalog
| Emitent | Kingdom of Bohemia |
|---|---|
| Rok | 1003-1034 |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nominał | 1 Denier |
| Waluta | Denier (935-1300) |
| Skład | Silver |
| Waga | |
| Średnica | |
| Grubość | |
| Kształt | Round (irregular) |
| Technika | Hammered |
| Orientacja | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Rytownik(zy) | |
| W obiegu do | 1210 |
| Źródło(a) | Cach#273 |
| Opis awersu | |
|---|---|
| Pismo awersu | Latin |
| Legenda awersu | |
| Opis rewersu | |
| Pismo rewersu | Latin |
| Legenda rewersu | |
| Krawędź | Smooth. |
| Mennica | |
| Nakład |
ND (1003-1034) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 5969641310 |
| Dodatkowe informacje |
Historical Context: This Denier was issued during the tumultuous reign of Jaromir, Duke of Bohemia (1003-1034). Jaromir's rule was marked by repeated depositions and restorations, caught between the ambitions of Polish Duke Boleslaw I Chrobry and Holy Roman Emperor Henry II. Despite political instability, the continued minting of deniers underscored Bohemia's economic autonomy and its role in Central European trade. These coins served as the primary medium of exchange, reflecting the enduring, albeit challenged, sovereignty of the Premyslid dynasty.
Artistry: The engraver of this Denier, typical for early medieval Bohemian coinage, remains anonymous. The stylistic school reflects nascent Romanesque influence, characterized by simplified, almost abstract renditions. Cach#273 typically features a stylized ducal bust on the obverse, with rudimentary features and a crown. The reverse commonly displays a prominent cross, often with pellets or wedges in the angles, surrounded by a Latin legend. Legends are frequently blundered or abbreviated, reflecting local minting traditions rather than high artistic refinement.
Technical/Grading: For this Denier, key high-points include the duke's crown or hair, the nose and chin on the bust, and the central elements of the reverse cross. Technical strike qualities of early 11th-century Bohemian deniers are often inconsistent. Flans are typically irregular in shape and thickness; off-center strikes are common. Legends frequently exhibit weakness or are partially off-flan. A well-struck example would show clear device separation from the field, with legible legend portions, despite the coarse fabric typical of the era.