Katalog
| Emitent | Holy Roman Empire |
|---|---|
| Rok | 1002-1009 |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nominał | 1 Denier (Pfennig) |
| Waluta | Denier (843-1385) |
| Skład | Silver |
| Waga | 1.57 g |
| Średnica | 21 mm |
| Grubość | |
| Kształt | Round (irregular) |
| Technika | Hammered |
| Orientacja | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Rytownik(zy) | |
| W obiegu do | |
| Źródło(a) | Hahn Radas#85a, Kluge Kar#86, Dann Sa#1125 |
| Opis awersu | Temple with moneyer name in it, legend around. |
|---|---|
| Pismo awersu | Latin |
| Legenda awersu |
HENRICVS REX DIOTP (Translation: King Henry.) |
| Opis rewersu | Cross with two triangles, one annulet and a group of three pellets in quarters, legend around. |
| Pismo rewersu | Latin |
| Legenda rewersu |
+ NIVVAN CIVITAS (Translation: Neuburg.) |
| Krawędź | |
| Mennica | |
| Nakład |
ND (1002-1009) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 3093801930 |
| Dodatkowe informacje |
Historical Context: This Denier, struck at the Neuburg mint (1002-1009), dates to the early reign of Henry II, Holy Roman Emperor. Succeeding Otto III, Henry II, known as Saint Henry, focused on consolidating imperial authority and fostering close ties with the Church, a hallmark of Ottonian rule. The Neuburg mint's output reflects the decentralized nature of imperial coinage, yet its issuance signifies a period of stability and imperial legitimacy across his vast territories.
Artistry: The anonymous engraver worked within the Ottonian numismatic tradition, characterized by symbolic rather than naturalistic representation. The reverse prominently features a stylized temple, a common early medieval motif often interpreted as a church, the Heavenly Jerusalem, or sacred imperial power. The obverse likely bore a simplified imperial bust or monogram, rendered with characteristic directness and spiritual emphasis, reflecting the religious underpinnings of imperial authority.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a 1.57 gram, 21 mm silver flan, this Denier typically exhibits early medieval minting characteristics. Key high-points for evaluation include the clarity of the temple's roofline and columns, plus any central device. The imperial legend, if present, should be legible. Common strike issues include irregular flans, variable striking pressure leading to weak areas, and occasional off-center strikes. Full details on both sides are critical for higher grades.