Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Denier Bracteate - Wladyslaw III Spindleshanks or Wladyslaw Odonic Gniezno or Poznań mint

Uitgever Greater Poland, Duchy of
Jaar 1202-1238
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Round (irregular)
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde As a bracteate, this coin is struck on a single thin flan; the reverse presents an incuse mirror image of the obverse design, showing the faint negative impression of the seated figure and surrounding decorative elements pressed through from the obverse strike. No independent reverse design or legend is present, which is characteristic of all bracteate coinage of this period and region.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Plain
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

The attribution of this bracteate to either Władysław III Laskonogi or Władysław Odonic reflects one of the more stubborn disputes in Polish medieval numismatics. The two rulers were bitter rivals who traded control of Greater Poland repeatedly between roughly 1202 and 1239, sometimes holding different parts of the duchy simultaneously. Gniezno and Poznań exchanged hands more than once during this period, making mint attribution nearly impossible without documentary evidence that simply does not survive.

Kopicki 153 groups the type under both rulers precisely because no die or hoard evidence has conclusively settled the question.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT