Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Greater Poland, Duchy of |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1202-1238 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Round (irregular) |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | As a bracteate, this coin is struck on a single thin flan; the reverse presents an incuse mirror image of the obverse design, showing the faint negative impression of the seated figure and surrounding decorative elements pressed through from the obverse strike. No independent reverse design or legend is present, which is characteristic of all bracteate coinage of this period and region. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Plain |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The attribution of this bracteate to either Władysław III Laskonogi or Władysław Odonic reflects one of the more stubborn disputes in Polish medieval numismatics. The two rulers were bitter rivals who traded control of Greater Poland repeatedly between roughly 1202 and 1239, sometimes holding different parts of the duchy simultaneously. Gniezno and Poznań exchanged hands more than once during this period, making mint attribution nearly impossible without documentary evidence that simply does not survive.
Kopicki 153 groups the type under both rulers precisely because no die or hoard evidence has conclusively settled the question.