Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Greater Poland, Duchy of |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 1202-1238 |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Round (irregular) |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | As a bracteate, this coin is struck on a single thin flan; the reverse presents an incuse mirror image of the obverse design, showing the faint negative impression of the seated figure and surrounding decorative elements pressed through from the obverse strike. No independent reverse design or legend is present, which is characteristic of all bracteate coinage of this period and region. |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Plain |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
The attribution of this bracteate to either Władysław III Laskonogi or Władysław Odonic reflects one of the more stubborn disputes in Polish medieval numismatics. The two rulers were bitter rivals who traded control of Greater Poland repeatedly between roughly 1202 and 1239, sometimes holding different parts of the duchy simultaneously. Gniezno and Poznań exchanged hands more than once during this period, making mint attribution nearly impossible without documentary evidence that simply does not survive.
Kopicki 153 groups the type under both rulers precisely because no die or hoard evidence has conclusively settled the question.