Danh mục
| Đơn vị phát hành | Danish Estonia |
|---|---|
| Năm | 1219-1346 |
| Loại | Standard circulation coin |
| Mệnh giá | 1 Denier (Hohlpfennig) |
| Tiền tệ | Denier (1219-1346) |
| Chất liệu | Silver |
| Trọng lượng | 0.12 g |
| Đường kính | 15 mm |
| Độ dày | |
| Hình dạng | Round (irregular) |
| Kỹ thuật | Hammered (bracteate) |
| Hướng | |
| Nghệ nhân khắc | |
| Lưu hành đến | |
| Tài liệu tham khảo | Haljak II#5 |
| Mô tả mặt trước | Crowned face surrounded by a circle. |
|---|---|
| Chữ viết mặt trước | |
| Chữ khắc mặt trước | |
| Mô tả mặt sau | Uniface (brakteat). |
| Chữ viết mặt sau | |
| Chữ khắc mặt sau | |
| Cạnh | Smooth. |
| Xưởng đúc | |
| Số lượng đúc |
ND (1219-1346) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 6621510150 |
| Thông tin bổ sung |
Historical Context: This Denier Bracteate from Reval (modern Tallinn) signifies the early monetary system under Danish rule in Estonia, following Valdemar II’s conquest in 1219. The 1219-1346 period marks the consolidation of Danish authority, establishing Reval as a vital Hanseatic trade hub amidst the Northern Crusades. These diminutive silver coins were essential small change, facilitating daily commerce and reinforcing Danish suzerainty in a strategically crucial Baltic region before the territory’s eventual sale to the Teutonic Order.
Artistry: Characteristic of early medieval bracteates, the engraver is anonymous, with the stylistic school emphasizing functional simplicity. The design, referenced as Haljak II#5, typically features a central motif like a simple cross, a crowned initial, or a symbol pertinent to Reval or the Danish crown. Bracteate artistry prioritized immediate recognition and production efficiency over intricate iconography, reflecting the need for high-volume, low-denomination coinage in a developing commercial center.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a minuscule 0.12 gram, 15 mm silver flan, this bracteate exhibits typical characteristics. High-points are usually the raised elements of the central design, such as a cross's intersection or a crown's apex. Due to the single-die strike and extreme thinness, examples often show an uneven or weak strike, off-centering, and susceptibility to buckling, cracking, or edge damage. Full detail on the entire motif is rare, with peripheral flatness common, requiring careful assessment of the central device for grading.