Catálogo
| Emissor | Danish Estonia |
|---|---|
| Ano | 1219-1346 |
| Tipo | Standard circulation coin |
| Valor | 1 Denier (Hohlpfennig) |
| Moeda | Denier (1219-1346) |
| Composição | Silver |
| Peso | 0.12 g |
| Diâmetro | 15 mm |
| Espessura | |
| Formato | Round (irregular) |
| Técnica | Hammered (bracteate) |
| Orientação | |
| Gravador(es) | |
| Em circulação até | |
| Referência(s) | Haljak II#5 |
| Descrição do anverso | Crowned face surrounded by a circle. |
|---|---|
| Escrita do anverso | |
| Legenda do anverso | |
| Descrição do reverso | Uniface (brakteat). |
| Escrita do reverso | |
| Legenda do reverso | |
| Bordo | Smooth. |
| Casa da moeda | |
| Tiragem |
ND (1219-1346) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 6621510150 |
| Informações adicionais |
Historical Context: This Denier Bracteate from Reval (modern Tallinn) signifies the early monetary system under Danish rule in Estonia, following Valdemar II’s conquest in 1219. The 1219-1346 period marks the consolidation of Danish authority, establishing Reval as a vital Hanseatic trade hub amidst the Northern Crusades. These diminutive silver coins were essential small change, facilitating daily commerce and reinforcing Danish suzerainty in a strategically crucial Baltic region before the territory’s eventual sale to the Teutonic Order.
Artistry: Characteristic of early medieval bracteates, the engraver is anonymous, with the stylistic school emphasizing functional simplicity. The design, referenced as Haljak II#5, typically features a central motif like a simple cross, a crowned initial, or a symbol pertinent to Reval or the Danish crown. Bracteate artistry prioritized immediate recognition and production efficiency over intricate iconography, reflecting the need for high-volume, low-denomination coinage in a developing commercial center.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a minuscule 0.12 gram, 15 mm silver flan, this bracteate exhibits typical characteristics. High-points are usually the raised elements of the central design, such as a cross's intersection or a crown's apex. Due to the single-die strike and extreme thinness, examples often show an uneven or weak strike, off-centering, and susceptibility to buckling, cracking, or edge damage. Full detail on the entire motif is rare, with peripheral flatness common, requiring careful assessment of the central device for grading.