Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Greater Poland, Duchy of |
|---|---|
| Year | 1138-1202 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Denier (1138-1303) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Gniezno or Kalisz mint |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Mieszko III ruled Greater Poland twice — expelled by his own nobles in 1177, he spent decades in political exile before reclaiming power, and his bracteate issues span both periods of rule, making precise attribution of individual dies to specific years essentially impossible. These thin, single-sided strikes were produced by hammering a flan so fine that the reverse is a mirror intaglio of the obverse — a technique that demanded skilled die-cutters but minimal silver, convenient for a duke whose treasury was repeatedly strained by dynastic warfare among the fragmented Piast succession.
The assignment between Gniezno and Kalisz remains unresolved in the literature; Kopicki 114 groups them together precisely because no archaeological find-spot evidence has yet separated them conclusively.