Catalogue
| Émetteur | Dorpat, Bishopric of |
|---|---|
| Année | 1224-1248 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Valeur | 1 Hohlpfennig |
| Devise | Denier (1224-1346) |
| Composition | Silver |
| Poids | 0.13 g |
| Diamètre | 12 mm |
| Épaisseur | |
| Forme | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered (bracteate) |
| Orientation | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Graveur(s) | |
| En circulation jusqu’à | |
| Référence(s) | Haljak II#454 |
| Description de l’avers | Crowned face with star to the left and right, all surrounded by a ring of dots. |
|---|---|
| Écriture de l’avers | |
| Légende de l’avers | |
| Description du revers | Uniface (brakteat). |
| Écriture du revers | |
| Légende du revers | |
| Tranche | Smooth. |
| Atelier | |
| Tirage |
ND (1224-1248) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 6676406560 |
| Informations supplémentaires |
Historical Context: This Denier Bracteate, issued by Hermann I as Bishop of Dorpat (1224-1248), marks a pivotal era in the Livonian Crusade and the establishment of ecclesiastical power in the Baltic. Hermann I, a Cistercian monk and brother of Albert of Riga, was instrumental in consolidating the Bishopric of Dorpat (modern Tartu, Estonia) as a significant spiritual and temporal entity. The issuance of coinage underscored the bishop's emerging sovereignty and the burgeoning economic activity within his domain, reflecting German and Danish expansion into the eastern Baltic.
Artistry: As a bracteate, this coin features a single-sided design, struck in high relief on a thin flan, appearing incuse on the reverse. Engravers for such early medieval issues are unknown; the stylistic execution reflects a localized, simplified Romanesque or nascent Gothic aesthetic. The design likely incorporates ecclesiastical symbols pertinent to the Bishopric of Dorpat, such as a crozier, miter, or stylized cross, often framed by rudimentary legends. Its focus was on clear, impactful iconography.
Technical/Grading: Struck in silver, this minute bracteate weighs a mere 0.13 grams and measures 12 mm. Its extreme thinness makes it inherently fragile and susceptible to damage. Key grading considerations include the completeness and sharpness of the strike, especially the central motif, which often suffers from weakness or flattening. Flan integrity, including absence of cracks or folds, is paramount. Centering and overall roundness, often imperfect for these early issues, also contribute to its numismatic assessment.