Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Denier Bracteate - Anonymous

Uitgever Principality of Anhalt
Jaar 1250-1299
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Silver
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Central field depicts a standing frontal figure, likely a ruler or bishop, rendered in low relief characteristic of thin bracteate coinage. The figure appears robed and is flanked on either side by stylized foliate or architectural elements, possibly towers or branches, suggesting heraldic or emblematic framing. The composition is enclosed within a beaded or rope-like inner circle, itself set within the irregularly shaped flan typical of thirteenth-century hammered bracteates. The design is executed in the simplified, slightly schematic artistic style common to Central German bracteate production of the late Hohenstaufen and early interregnum period. No legible inscription or legend is present, consistent with the anonymous classification of this issue.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (1250-1299)
Aanvullende informatie

Anhalt's bracteate deniers from this period were struck under the divided lordship that followed the 1252 partition among the sons of Heinrich I, leaving multiple small courts each operating their own dies with minimal central oversight. The resulting proliferation of types — Thorm. 356 among them — makes attribution to a specific lord nearly impossible without a documented find context.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT